<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod?</title>
        <link>http://thebasspond.com/topic/2026/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Hey  you glass guys, my x boss came into work with a pair of custom built Fenwick flyrods that are of unknown line weight. Both built in the 80&#39;s (or so he
remembers), bout brown fiberglass with spiggot ferules.  The 9&#39; er has a very fat butt but it&#39;s very light weight for a glass rod. It is two piece, 
slow action and has the code 1082 on a decal. I&#39;m thinking it &quot;feels&quot; like and 8 wt but the code makes no sence to me. THe other is 8&#39; , 2 pc
and has the same... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:00:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/9066/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-9066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <br>Spigot ferruled blanks were mostly made by Fisher and I have yet to cast one of their rods I didn't like. And most of the Fenwicks I have cast or read about are well received too. Either way it should be a fine fishing rod. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (JeffSod)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/9066</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:00:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/9065/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-9065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Turns out he had the guy who built him the rods get him reels and matching lines. ( He forgot as it was 25-30 years ago) The heavier rod was rigged with a Phluger 1498 medalist and a WF10F line. The smaller/lighter a 1495 with a variaty of 6 wts. The reels were still in their origional box and plastic bags when he brought them to me! <br>Anyway, we lawn cast teh rods an I have to say I was impressed.&nbsp; The 10 wt in particular felt light and was not fatiguing at all. ( unlike other glass rods i've cast/swore off.) Anyway, he'll be fishing them soon .<br>Thanks<br>Dave ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Wee Hooker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/9065</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:55:19 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8993/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I meant to say try the 8 footer with a 5 or 6 wt line. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Stonefly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8993</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:59:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8992/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8992</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I looked in an old blank catalogue and the FL at the beginning stands for flyrod.I can&#39;t find a 1082 listed but that may be an older blank than my
catalogues have listed.If the diameter of the butt is as large as you say it has to be a nine wt. or better. It is definitely a blank number and not a rod
number in my opinion.I don&#39;t think Fenwick had spigot ferrules though. I&#39;ve got afactory FF108 and it&#39;s a nine ft. 9 wt. It also has a butt of
3/4&quot; diameter.If your rod is made with the same blank, an eight wt. is definitely too light.This thing is a bit of a bear and would probably throw a ten
wt. and possibly an eleven weight at short distances. The rod weighs 4 7/8 ounces, but it doesn&#39;t really feel that heavy.Try the 8 wt. with a 5 or a 6 wt.
line.Be careful though, fiberglass can get to be an addiction. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Stonefly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8992</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:57:26 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8878/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8878</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>If you haven&#39;t already, post this over on fiberglass flyrodders and someone will be able to give you more info than I can.</p>

<p>Fenwick generally labled their blanks FL (fly) then the length in inches just as you guessed, then usually the line weight. Sometimes followed by an F which
stood for &quot;ferruled&quot;. They sold many as one piece and left it to the builder to ferrule as they saw fit.</p>

<p>You may be right about the 9 foot rod, Fenwick made very few 9&#39; glass and I believe they were all 9 or 10 weights. All I can tell you about the 8 footer
is that it is a 5, 6, or 7 weight.</p>

<p>One more thing, do they say Fenwick or have the Logo? Because Lamiglas also had very similar model numbers. They had an FL108-7m for example. Old Lamiglas
blanks are more of a caramel  color while the Fenwicks will be dark brown, or bright yellow. Also Lamiglas used spigot ferrules extensively.</p>

<p>Hope this helps.</p>

<p> </p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (WetFlyAction)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8878</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:07 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8802/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Thanks, My BAd. The code was actually FL1082. I figured the FL was for Feralite (SP?) which I think was the name for Fenwicks lightweight glass layup blanks
but am not sure. ( This one has a but section that&#39;s got to be near 3/4&quot;in D but very light.in weight) Blank is brown. I also assumed, like albcorb,
that the 108 was length and the 2 was # of pieces. That&#39;s pretty standard code still today with rod manufacturers. That still leave the line weight missing
 though. I&#39;m thiking it should ahve read FL10892 if it was a 9&#39; 8 wt, 2pc.
<br>
Anyway, I just lawn cast the rod with a WF8F/I line. It cast OK but I think it needs a Wf9 as despite the rods softness, it doesn&#39;t load up much. BTW,
I&#39;m still not a glass fan but I have to say that the lightness of this rod does make it fishable for me. It would be interesting to catch something decient
on it.</p>

<p> </p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Wee Hooker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8802</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:41:38 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8799/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Found this on another site... seems helpful, so I copied to paste (oh, and it seems, based on how I read the below, that the blanks weren&#39;t fly rod blanks,
so they are probably able to handle more than an 8 weight... just a guess):
<br>
<br>
E means they&#39;re made from E-glass, not &quot;Fenglass&quot; which is what Fenwick called their S-glass material. E-glass means lower modulus and thicker
blank walls. They were either the same mustad yellow as Lamiglas E-glass sticks, or white.
<br>
<br>
The SU series were chochlate brown Fenglass.
<br>
<br>
The &quot;F&quot; suffix on the ESU 114 means two-piece. I would guess the F meant &quot;ferrule&quot; <img class="inlineimg" title="Confused" alt="" src="http://www.stripersonline.com/surftalk/images/smilies/confused.gif" border="0">
<br>
<br>
Fenwick used a similar product code to Lamiglas. The first three numbers of the blank model means the length in inches (I&#39;m wondering on that 114F, is it
really 11&#39; and if so, why it... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (spinzo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8799</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:27:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/reply/8797/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html#reply-8797</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not sure but I think the number translates as 108&quot;(9&#39;) 2 piece. I had found a site for vintage fenwick but haven&#39;t found it since.If it had an
additional number it would be the power classification or line weight, sorry but that&#39;s all I have.
<br>
Alan ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (albcorb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/sreply/8797</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:37:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Help with ID of fiberglass Fenwick Rod? ]]></title>
			<link>http://thebasspond.com/topic/2026/t/Help-with-ID-of-fiberglass-Fenwick-Rod-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hey  you glass guys, my x boss came into work with a pair of custom built Fenwick flyrods that are of unknown line weight. Both built in the 80&#39;s (or so he
remembers), bout brown fiberglass with spiggot ferules.  The 9&#39; er has a very fat butt but it&#39;s very light weight for a glass rod. It is two piece, 
slow action and has the code 1082 on a decal. I&#39;m thinking it &quot;feels&quot; like and 8 wt but the code makes no sence to me. THe other is 8&#39; , 2 pc
and has the same slow action and light feel and has no code at all. Wonderign if anybody has any info on what these rods could be.
<br>
(p.s. Yes, i will test cast tehm with various lines but I&#39;m trying to get a head start. I don&#39;t know squat about glass.)
<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance!
<br>
Dave. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Wee Hooker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://thebasspond.com/topic/2026</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 09:55:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>